In
this season of fraught political dialogue, if you can call it
dialogue rather than diatribe and demagoguery, I entertained the
thought of weighing in on some topics. However, when I read the
editorial pages I find them to be so partisan that reasonable speech
seems as remote as the stars and unheeded when it pops up. I think
the reason why local papers publish letters to the editor is to
prevent angry hotheads from actually doing something they will
regret. It is a real public service to deflect the misguided from
some intemperate or criminal act. Mercy! Hasn't the conversation
reached the shouting pitch on so many topics? If my stated mission is
the preservation of civilization and civility, ought I not add my
voice to the many?
On
topical subjects I am fairly familiar and we do take two newspapers
in the morning. We also listen to radio and watch television, so we
are fully exposed to reporting. Journalism used to be a profession in
which practitioners prided themselves on an impartial presentation of
issues. Now I see the trend is toward advocacy where many salient
facts are being presented in a biased fashion. Truth becomes a
casualty in this and we are then victims of our own prejudices since
we tend to seek out opinions which confirm our little preferences. We
delude ourselves by affirming how smart we are to share in the
opinion of so many. Don't get me wrong. There is nothing wrong with
advocacy. My Daddy was a lawyer and he practiced that craft all his
life for the benefit of many good people.
The
disturbing element in this stew of opinions is that everyone is
shouting at everyone else, if not directly then by proxy. The
name-calling and the scurrilous remarks are characteristic of
schoolyard behavior. This becomes all the more serious when adults
refine and routinely practice these rhetorical vices in the name of
tribalism. That's the beginning of real trouble and what begins as
local gang warfare becomes a model for international behavior, and
you know where that leads.
We
have lived through many disagreements in this country on very broad
topics and some have led to war. That was a terrible time when the
nation was riven. Throughout those travails the citizen-statesman was
a person to be respected, someone who offered his time, energy and
beliefs for the common good. The professional politician of today has
usurped this mantle of formerly noble service and winks at his
financial backers with an eye to re-election only. It is small wonder
that there is so much mistrust of and anger at our elected
representatives. Their class has been smeared recently by the conduct
of too many of their number.
In
keeping with my rating scheme for gauging the value of aspects of
modern living, I had expected to offer worthiness rankings on the
political front by awarding up to three tall hats for excellence. It
now seems I will have to hold them in my top desk drawer until the
tone of the current political discourse improves considerably.
Many kisses,
Celeste